Obi-Datti media, the media team of the 2023 Presidential candidate of the Labour Party, Peter Obi on Wednesday, described the evidence tendered by President Bola Tinubu, against Obi, at the Presidential Petition Tribunal in Abuja on Wednesday, July 5, 2023, as unsubstantiated.
Tinubu and his Deputy, Kashim Shettima, had on Wednesday, tendered a Labour Party’s Anambra membership register, as evidence to defend their case at the tribunal, that Obi was not eligible to contest for the last presidential election, because he was not registered as a member of the party as at the time of the election.
However, in a reaction to the development, the Obi-Datti media office which countered the claim through a statement signed by Diran Onifade on Wednesday, described the evidence tendered as an empty one, moving that the matter is of no consequence as it has already been settled by the Appeal Court.
The statement reads: “The ruling All Progressives Congress, APC, and Bola Ahmed Tinubu on Wednesday closed their case in the ongoing hearing of the Petition filed by the Labour Party, Candidate, Peter Obi.
“Among the documents submitted to the court is a register purported to be indicating that Obi is not a member of the Labour Party as stipulated by the Electoral guidelines.
“But unknown to them or they were feigning ignorance that the matter was long settled by the Court of Appeal in a Judgement delivered on Wednesday the 8th of February, 2023 by a team of three Justices led by the President of the Court of Appeal, Justice Monica Bolna’an Dongban-Mensem, Justice Ugochukwu Anthony Ogakwu, and Danlami Zama Senchi, in the case between the Allied Peoples Movement, APM, the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, Labour Party and Peter Gregory Obi.
“The Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja then dismissed the appeal by the APM, seeking to disqualify Peter Obi, from being the Presidential Candidate of the February 25 general election.
“In the appeal marked: CA/ABJ/CV/1414/2022, the Movement had approached the court, contending that the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, ought not to have recognised Peter Obi as a valid candidate for the presidential poll.
“APM said this was in consideration of the time Obi defected from the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, to the LP. The party argued that the period of Obi’s defection to contest the presidential election violated sections 77(2) and (3) of the Electoral Act, 2022.
“They also adduced that before Obi’s defection, the LP already sent a list of its registered members to the INEC. They then claimed that Obi lacked the right to be recognised as the LP flagbearer because his name was not on the list of the party members that were submitted to INEC.
“APM had urged the court to set aside the Federal High Court judgment which dismissed the suit it filed to challenge Obi’s candidacy on the same matter.
“But in a unanimous decision by the three-member panel of Justices, the appellate court said there was no merit in the appeal filed by APM.
“The Justices affirmed the decision of the Abuja High Court that had earlier dismissed the case saying that ‘the lower Court cannot be faulted, the appeal is devoid of merit, the same fails and it is deserving of dismissal.’
“Obi-Datti Media office wishes therefore to draw the attention of the public to this case and disregard the empty evidence and propaganda of the APC and its candidate in the highly contentious February 25 Presidential election Tinubu.”